An interesting concept from WD4ELG: a very brief summary of various QRP rigs. The Good and the Bad of each, distilled down to the minimum, by various QRPers:
FT-817ND biggest positive: shack in a box. I did Satellites, SSB, CW,
digital (with Signalink), FM. Listened to air band and police band. It
is rugged. I worked DX from the car. It was my go-anywhere rig.
FT817ND
biggest negative: you really need the CW filter. And the SOTA SSB
modulation enhancer. And it was getting long-in-the-tooth.
IC-705
biggest positive - SDR shack in a box. Think 7300 in a portable size,
plus bluetooth and Wifi. CW paddle and the included microphone, and you
are ready to rock and roll. I use it in shack daily, and can take it to a
local park.
IC-705 biggest negative - it is the largest rig.
Possibly most fragile. I'm not taking it anywhere unless I have it
protected in a backpack.
Penntek TR-35 biggest positive - everything from the front panel without menus!
Penntek TR-35 biggest negative - limited bands, won't work if battery is below 10V.
QMX biggest positive - Hans is a genius. SDR QRP rig now with SSB, for $150! Menus are intuitive.
QMXbiggest negative - so many options and capabilities, I need my cell phone to keep a local copy of the manual.
MTR3B Currahee biggest positive - smallest rig. TINY. Runs on a 9V duracell.
MTR3B Currahee biggest negative - everything is via menu, and it takes some getting used to. Only three bands.
.
QMX+ biggest positive: 6-160m, all modes in a tiny size
QMX+ biggest negative: narrow range of DC input doesn’t easily correspond to any battery type
KX2 biggest positive: complete station (rig, battery, ATU)
KX2 biggest negative: Unknown. The perfect QRP rig?
KX3 biggest positive: excellent rx characteristics (a mini-K3)
KX3 biggest negative: NiMH internal battery chemistry (low DC out, poor discharge curve)
(tr)uSDX biggest positive: cheap
(tr)uSDX biggest negative: poor audio receive, high level of splatter on SSB tx, poor menu accessibility
mcHF biggest positive: high performance-to-cost ratio
mcHF biggest negative: hit or miss on quality control
Hermes Lite 2 biggest positive: very high performance-to-cost ratio. Excellent on SSB, digital
Hermes Lite 2 biggest negative: requires PC for operation, good (not great) on CW.
SW-3B biggest positive: small, full 5W output, 3 most popular bands
SW-3B biggest negative: no major negatives
zBitx biggest positive: none
zBitx biggest negative: falsely advertised, poor receive-to-transmit transition
ATS-3B biggest positive: excellent low-noise receiver, sounds like a much more expensive rig
ATS-3B biggest negative: extensive SMD construction, difficult for many (most?) builders
IC-705 biggest positive: does everything, everywhere
IC-705 biggest negative: high current draw, awkward/unbalanced for table-top use
.
FT-817nd biggest positive: DC-to-daylight (160 - 2m all-mode coverage)
FT-817nd biggest negative: needs and external battery and external antenna tuner
FT-817nd second biggest negative: lack of CW filters
Elecraft KX-1 biggest positive: rig in the palm of your hand (radio/battery/ATU)
Elecraft KX-1 biggest negative: minimalist menu can be cryptic (I need to bring a cheat sheet with me)
QMX biggest positive: lots of features in a tiny radio
QMX biggest negative: lots of menus to work through
QCX-mini biggest positive: easy to use
QCX-mini biggest negative: single band
QDX biggest positive: easy to use for digital operations
QDX biggest negative: no phase-shift modes, only FSK
Penntek TR-35 biggest positive: no menus
Penntek TR-35 biggest negative: sidetone volume is a function of power out and RF/AF gain - can be loud if I have RF/AF gain max'ed out
(tr)uSDX biggest positive: easy to build, relatively easy to configure
(tr)uSDX biggest negative: weak audio that leads to oscillation if gain is too high
SW 40+ biggest positive: easy to use
SW 40+ biggest negative: no internal keyer
.
MFJ-9030 biggest positive: simple single-band, fun
MFJ-9030 biggest negative: Drift, resolved by contacting Rick K1BQT and MFJ, new caps from MFJ installed
MFJ-9440 biggest positive: EXCELLENT processor, adj. to 5W PEP with 12V gel cell
MFJ-9440 biggest negative: single band, CW option stunk
OHR 40M Sprint biggest positive: Sensitive receiver, solid 2W out, fun to op
OHR 40M Sprint biggest negative: DC receiver
OHR-400 biggest positive: Four-bander, fun to op
OHR-400 biggest negative: Large for a knapsack, digital freq counter accessory
IC-703 biggest positive: great big rig feel, Icom did two fixes under warranty, INRAD made filters, In 2004 $399 out the door from HRO
IC-703 biggest negative: CW filter solder to board not a drop in, requires a few minutes to take apart
.
.

Thanks for the list John!
ReplyDeleteWish I still had that OHR 40M Sprint that I built myself and later sold. I find it interesting that a "sensitive receiver" is both the biggest positive and the biggest negative. :)
Hi Bob - I'm not sure who wrote that particular group. I had an OHR-100 (20m) for a while and wish I'd bought the OHR-500. Those were good old days, weren't they?!
Delete73,
John
Thanks for QRP reviews, very helpful. Loved the waterfalls!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comment, Hunt. I've just returned from doing similar drone video over the Yellowstone River here in Montana with whitewater rafters making a few appearances. Video when we return home in a few weeks.
Delete73,
John
John, I am catching up on various QRP blogs and just saw that you share my thoughts on the QRP rigs. I am humbled, kind Sir. You continue to inspire me every time you post. Thanks for adding your perspectives to my list. This year, the POTA bug has bitten hard (along with some mosquitos when I go out in the field), and it has given me even more passion for QRP activities. 72, John!
ReplyDelete