An interesting concept from WD4ELG: a very brief summary of various QRP rigs. The Good and the Bad of each, distilled down to the minimum, by various QRPers:
FT-817ND biggest positive: shack in a box. I did Satellites, SSB, CW,
digital (with Signalink), FM. Listened to air band and police band. It
is rugged. I worked DX from the car. It was my go-anywhere rig.
FT817ND
biggest negative: you really need the CW filter. And the SOTA SSB
modulation enhancer. And it was getting long-in-the-tooth.
IC-705
biggest positive - SDR shack in a box. Think 7300 in a portable size,
plus bluetooth and Wifi. CW paddle and the included microphone, and you
are ready to rock and roll. I use it in shack daily, and can take it to a
local park.
IC-705 biggest negative - it is the largest rig.
Possibly most fragile. I'm not taking it anywhere unless I have it
protected in a backpack.
Penntek TR-35 biggest positive - everything from the front panel without menus!
Penntek TR-35 biggest negative - limited bands, won't work if battery is below 10V.
QMX biggest positive - Hans is a genius. SDR QRP rig now with SSB, for $150! Menus are intuitive.
QMXbiggest negative - so many options and capabilities, I need my cell phone to keep a local copy of the manual.
MTR3B Currahee biggest positive - smallest rig. TINY. Runs on a 9V duracell.
MTR3B Currahee biggest negative - everything is via menu, and it takes some getting used to. Only three bands.
.
QMX+ biggest positive: 6-160m, all modes in a tiny size
QMX+ biggest negative: narrow range of DC input doesn’t easily correspond to any battery type
KX2 biggest positive: complete station (rig, battery, ATU)
KX2 biggest negative: Unknown. The perfect QRP rig?
KX3 biggest positive: excellent rx characteristics (a mini-K3)
KX3 biggest negative: NiMH internal battery chemistry (low DC out, poor discharge curve)
(tr)uSDX biggest positive: cheap
(tr)uSDX biggest negative: poor audio receive, high level of splatter on SSB tx, poor menu accessibility
mcHF biggest positive: high performance-to-cost ratio
mcHF biggest negative: hit or miss on quality control
Hermes Lite 2 biggest positive: very high performance-to-cost ratio. Excellent on SSB, digital
Hermes Lite 2 biggest negative: requires PC for operation, good (not great) on CW.
SW-3B biggest positive: small, full 5W output, 3 most popular bands
SW-3B biggest negative: no major negatives
zBitx biggest positive: none
zBitx biggest negative: falsely advertised, poor receive-to-transmit transition
ATS-3B biggest positive: excellent low-noise receiver, sounds like a much more expensive rig
ATS-3B biggest negative: extensive SMD construction, difficult for many (most?) builders
IC-705 biggest positive: does everything, everywhere
IC-705 biggest negative: high current draw, awkward/unbalanced for table-top use
.
FT-817nd biggest positive: DC-to-daylight (160 - 2m all-mode coverage)
FT-817nd biggest negative: needs and external battery and external antenna tuner
FT-817nd second biggest negative: lack of CW filters
Elecraft KX-1 biggest positive: rig in the palm of your hand (radio/battery/ATU)
Elecraft KX-1 biggest negative: minimalist menu can be cryptic (I need to bring a cheat sheet with me)
QMX biggest positive: lots of features in a tiny radio
QMX biggest negative: lots of menus to work through
QCX-mini biggest positive: easy to use
QCX-mini biggest negative: single band
QDX biggest positive: easy to use for digital operations
QDX biggest negative: no phase-shift modes, only FSK
Penntek TR-35 biggest positive: no menus
Penntek TR-35 biggest negative: sidetone volume is a function of power out and RF/AF gain - can be loud if I have RF/AF gain max'ed out
(tr)uSDX biggest positive: easy to build, relatively easy to configure
(tr)uSDX biggest negative: weak audio that leads to oscillation if gain is too high
SW 40+ biggest positive: easy to use
SW 40+ biggest negative: no internal keyer
.
MFJ-9030 biggest positive: simple single-band, fun
MFJ-9030 biggest negative: Drift, resolved by contacting Rick K1BQT and MFJ, new caps from MFJ installed
MFJ-9440 biggest positive: EXCELLENT processor, adj. to 5W PEP with 12V gel cell
MFJ-9440 biggest negative: single band, CW option stunk
OHR 40M Sprint biggest positive: Sensitive receiver, solid 2W out, fun to op
OHR 40M Sprint biggest negative: DC receiver
OHR-400 biggest positive: Four-bander, fun to op
OHR-400 biggest negative: Large for a knapsack, digital freq counter accessory
IC-703 biggest positive: great big rig feel, Icom did two fixes under warranty, INRAD made filters, In 2004 $399 out the door from HRO
IC-703 biggest negative: CW filter solder to board not a drop in, requires a few minutes to take apart
.
.
Thanks for the list John!
ReplyDeleteWish I still had that OHR 40M Sprint that I built myself and later sold. I find it interesting that a "sensitive receiver" is both the biggest positive and the biggest negative. :)
Hi Bob - I'm not sure who wrote that particular group. I had an OHR-100 (20m) for a while and wish I'd bought the OHR-500. Those were good old days, weren't they?!
Delete73,
John