Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Hoping the best for the ARA San Juan

Navies from at least 6 different countries are now involved in the search for the missing Argentine submarine and with each passing hour, the search will become more of a recovery operation and less of a rescue attempt. While my condolences are with the crewmembers and their families, I and another ex-submariner friend are finding it hard not to speculate on what might have gone wrong.

Submarines, regardless of which countries build them, are marvels of technology that incorporate numerous back-up systems and redundancies. Despite this, the most vulnerable part of a submarine - the one most likely to cause a catastrophe if it fails - is the Main Induction Valve on the snorkel. This is true of both nuclear subs and diesel-electrics like the ARA San Juan. Diesel-electrics have to snorkel more often than nuke subs in order to charge their batteries (nuke subs snorkel periodically in order to quickly refresh the onboard air and to perform periodic maintenance on their emergency diesel engine).

During snorkeling, the sub is at some depth just a bit shallower than periscope depth since the hollow snorkel mast is shorter than the periscope. It is bothersome to snorkel in rough weather because waves wash over the snorkel, causing sensors on it to vent the air pressure that holds the Main Induction valve open so that seawater doesn't enter the engine room. With the release of air pressure, the valve snaps shut like a bear trap, blocking sea water from entering.

Regardless of the sea state, those sensors are periodically (I seem to recall every 5-10 minutes) tested while snorkeling by the Chief of the Watch. He hits a switch on the Ballast Control Panel that simulates sea water on the sensors. This closes the Main Induction valve and causes everyone's ears onboard to pop due to the vacuum caused by the fact that the diesel is still exhausting air (and lots of it) but failing to pull air in. The air supply for the diesel, for a few seconds, is the ambient air in the "people tank". The sensation is similar to flying in an airplane but a bit more pronounced.

If the sensors fail to close the valve, they are immediately closed manually and the snorkeling operation is terminated.

There are three things that make snorkeling potentially dangerous for diesel subs:

  • The incredible amount and weight of water than can be taken onboard in just a matter of seconds.
  • The fact that water sucked into the engine room will shut down the diesel and forward propulsion will cease. The sub was trimmed for neutral buoyancy at 4 to 6 knots in order to maintain consistent depth while snorkeling - without forward motion, it is now negatively buoyant (ie, heavy) further exacerbating the flooding.
  • In heavy seas, which was the case where the San Juan was operating - water was almost certainly coming over the snorkel mast if they were snorkeling, requiring the induction valve sensors and the mechanical sequence of events to operate properly 100% of the time. Nuke subs won't snorkel in such conditions; diesel sub's schedules are dictated by their batteries' state of charge.

This series of events happened to the USS Squalus in 300 feet of water in 1939. Most, but not all, of the crew were rescued. I hope for a good outcome for all those involved with the San Juan.


  1. Interesting information that you certainly will not read anywhere else I think. I hope they will find the sub and everyone is alive. But after so many days I doubt a good end? 73, Bas

    1. I doubt that sub will ever be found. They are hard enough to find while in operation and, according to news report, their air would have been exhausted by late yesterday.